The world wants change in Israel — not sure it's ready for the opposition's plan

A Financial Times analysis examines the expected policy changes in Israel if Gadi Eisenkot replaces Benjamin Netanyahu: a shift in settlement policy, rapprochement with the US, and willingness for regional agreements, alongside a continued tough security line and opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state.

A Financial Times analysis examines the expected policy changes in Israel if Gadi Eisenkot replaces Benjamin Netanyahu after the elections on October 27. The analysis, based on conversations with opposition sources, diplomats, and commentators, points to a continued tough security line alongside changes in settlement policy, rapprochement with the US, and willingness for regional agreements. According to the sources, an alternative government might reduce the establishment of illegal outposts, evacuate several outposts near Palestinian villages, and resume practical cooperation with the Palestinian Authority, including the transfer of tax funds. However, on one central point there is broad agreement: the establishment of a Palestinian state is not on the agenda. Eisenkot himself has never used the term 'Palestinian state', but has previously warned that annexing 2.8 million Palestinians to Israel would pose a threat to the Zionist enterprise. In the Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria arenas, a new government might show greater flexibility regarding American initiatives and ceasefire agreements. The analysis ends with a question mark: the composition of the future coalition will determine the ability to advance new policy, and great hopes of actors around the world may become an obstacle when they encounter political and security constraints.