Is Tom Barrack fit to represent America in the Middle East?

An opinion piece questions the fitness of Tom Barrack as the American envoy to the Middle East, claiming he said antisemitism 'didn't exist,' suggested Zionism became a problem in 1948, and repeatedly gives Israel's adversaries the benefit of the doubt. The article argues this is a matter of judgment, not just unfortunate wording.

An opinion piece on Arutz Sheva questions whether Tom Barrack, the American envoy to the Middle East, is fit to represent America in the region. The article claims that Barrack has said antisemitism 'didn't exist,' suggested that Zionism became a problem in 1948, and repeatedly gives Israel's adversaries the benefit of the doubt. The piece argues that these are not just unfortunate word choices but a matter of judgment. The article does not provide direct quotes or specific sources for these claims, nor does it name the author of the opinion.