You cannot blame Netanyahu for receiving warnings of the massacre without presenting evidence

Yuval Malka, a retired intelligence officer, attacks claims that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu received a direct warning about the October 7 massacre from foreign leaders. He calls for presenting documented evidence instead of relying on leaks and anonymous sources, and warns against political use of unsubstantiated claims in the midst of an election campaign.

Yuval Malka, a retired intelligence officer, publishes an opinion piece on Channel 14 in which he sharply attacks claims that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu received a direct warning about the October 7 massacre. Malka specifically refers to journalistic claims that Netanyahu received a warning from Mohammed bin Zayed and from the head of Egyptian intelligence before the attack. He argues that these claims rely on 'sources said' and 'unnamed sources' without proven documentation, and warns against political use of unsubstantiated information in the midst of an election campaign. Malka, who presents himself as familiar with the intelligence world, explains that intelligence information undergoes a professional process of assessment and cross-referencing before being presented to the political echelon, and that a prime minister is not a private individual whose political activity is undocumented. He calls on journalists to present concrete evidence - recordings of conversations, documents, meeting records - instead of relying on rumors and leaks. The article reflects the channel's position supporting Netanyahu and condemning what is presented as a media campaign against him.