Shameless legal advice.

Naveh Dromi claims that the testimony of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit in the Netanyahu trial revealed a dirty, political, and corrupt investigation, and that Mandelblit himself admitted to serious professional failures.

Naveh Dromi writes that the testimony of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit in the Netanyahu trial revealed a dirty, political, and corrupt investigation. According to him, Mandelblit admitted with his own mouth to serious professional failures: he did not review all the evidence in Case 4000, did not know all 315 incidents in the indictment, and confirmed that actions were taken without his knowledge and approvals were given without his consent. Dromi claims that Mandelblit transformed from Attorney General into someone playing with the fate of the State of Israel, and that the legal system moved to the center of public controversy due to these cases. The article argues that the right-wing camp was under political and public boycott following the false determination that Netanyahu is corrupt, and that this week Mandelblit proved that he was actually at the head of a dirty investigation. Dromi links the affair to five election campaigns, which he claims would not have occurred without the bribery excuse. He calls for a re-examination of the systems that led us to this point, similar to the criticism of the IDF since October 7.

Shameless legal advice.