The conflict behind bars and threats in prison ended with house arrest for the main defendant

The court hearing in the case of threats from prison ended with house arrest for the main defendant. The defense attacked the voice identification and the prosecution's interpretation of the conversations, in which 'Abu Hamed' and 'Reda' were mentioned.

The court hearing in the case, which was based on phone calls and threats from prison, ended with a decision for house arrest for the main defendant under restrictive conditions. The defense attacked the voice identification and the prosecution's interpretation of the conversations, including calls in which individuals referred to as 'Abu Hamed' and 'Reda' were mentioned. The defense argued that it could not be determined with certainty that the defendant participated in the conversation from September 10, and that there are gaps between the identity of the speakers as attributed in the indictment and the investigation materials. The prosecution was quoted as saying that this is a 'respondent with a not-light criminal record'.