Canceling Netanyahu's trial is not a privilege or a political compromise, but a duty

Yaara Zard argues that Netanyahu's trial must be canceled immediately, in light of Avichai Mandelblit's testimony that he did not remember if he authorized an investigation on suspicion of bribery in Case 4000. The article quotes attorney Amit Hadad, who attacked the timing of the indictment before the elections.

Yaara Zard, a commentator on Channel 14, argues that Netanyahu's trial should be canceled not as a political compromise but as a legal and moral duty. The article focuses on the testimony of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit, who did not remember if he authorized an investigation of the Prime Minister on suspicion of bribery in Case 4000. Attorney Amit Hadad attacked Mandelblit over the timing of the publication of the suspicion sheet before the elections and asked about improper considerations. The prosecution objected to the question, and the judges left for consultation. The article states that the trial is "frivolous" and must be canceled immediately.

Canceling Netanyahu's trial is not a privilege or a political compromise, but a duty