19 seats, two blocs and one tangle: the debate on the future of the coalition

Boaz Golani argues that the 19 seats of the Arab parties create a coalitional tangle, because the two parties do not accept the definition of Israel as a nation-state. He proposes a constitution that would anchor the identity of the state and require recognition of the national framework as a condition for political integration.

Boaz Golani, a senior research fellow at the Ne'eman Institute and professor emeritus at the Technion, argues that the 19 seats of the Arab parties change the political equation and create a coalitional tangle. According to him, Ra'am and the Joint List do not accept the definition of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people and advocate the idea of a "state of all its citizens," which distances them from the Jewish majority. He notes that Ra'am chairman Mansour Abbas condemned the October 7 massacre but refrained from defining Hamas as a terrorist organization. The solution he proposes is a constitutional anchoring of the state's identity based on the Declaration of Independence, which would replace the Nation-State Law and require every party to accept the fundamental principles. The article emphasizes that Israeli Arabs deserve representation, but full political partnership requires recognition of the national framework.

19 seats, two blocs and one tangle: the debate on the future of the coalition