Trump wants to end aid to Israel: the real test will come in wartime | Dr. Ofer Israeli

Dr. Ofer Israeli analyzes Trump's intention to end security aid to Israel. Three main risks: erosion of American commitment, damage to Israel's qualitative military edge, and operational dependence on supply chains. Alongside potential benefits, the article calls for a professional review and an alternative arrangement backed by Congress.

Dr. Ofer Israeli analyzes the significance of Donald Trump's intention to end American security aid to Israel. The article identifies three central risks: erosion of American commitment, which could be perceived as distancing; damage to Israel's qualitative military edge, as the administration's priorities may shift; and operational dependence on American supply chains, which could make wartime decisions vulnerable to political considerations. Alongside these, potential benefits are noted, such as reducing budgetary dependence and strengthening Israeli industries. The conclusion: the next government must examine the agreement based on professional staff work, and clarify to Washington that the cessation of aid should not be advanced without an alternative arrangement backed by budgets, congressional support, and oversight mechanisms.