The Pillar of Statehood: The Constitutional Power of the Supreme Court

Prof. Muhammad Watad praises in an opinion piece the conduct of Supreme Court Justice Noam Solberg as chairman of the Central Elections Committee, presenting it as a model of statehood, professionalism, and judicial independence. The article addresses concerns about foreign funding and external interference in elections, and emphasizes institutional cooperation with the Attorney General and the Shin Bet.

Prof. Muhammad Watad, president of the Ramat Gan Academic College, publishes an opinion piece praising the conduct of Supreme Court Justice Noam Solberg as chairman of the Central Elections Committee. The article argues that Solberg manages complex events in a transparent, substantive, and impartial manner, thereby strengthening public trust in the judicial system. The article addresses concerns about foreign funding and attempts at external interference in the election process, and presents Solberg as leading the committee with determination and restraint. It further claims that the Supreme Court as a whole is characterized by statehood, judicial independence, and high legal quality, and that the political division common in public discourse does not reflect the complexity of judicial work. The article concludes that the committee's management and substantive rulings set a high standard of integrity and national responsibility.