Netanyahu – Eisenkot: The elections between fear and normalcy

Yaron Dkl analyzes the election campaign between Netanyahu and Eisenkot. Netanyahu identifies the weakness of the opposing camp in the lack of a clear answer for dealing with Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah. Eisenkot offers 'sanity' and 'normalcy' but according to the article does not provide details on his policy. The article claims that Eisenkot can offer an alternative of responsibility and planning instead of intimidation.

Yaron Dkl analyzes in ynet the election campaign between Benjamin Netanyahu and Gadi Eisenkot. Netanyahu, according to the article, identifies the Achilles heel of the opposing camp: the lack of a clear answer on how they will deal with Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah if they form a government. The article notes that Netanyahu uses a constant campaign of intimidation, while flooding threats on various fronts and claiming that only he can maintain Israel's security. In contrast, Eisenkot offers 'sanity' and 'normalcy', but according to the article, he is dragged into arguments dictated by Netanyahu and does not provide details on his security policy or the diplomatic move he proposes. The article claims that Eisenkot can offer the public an alternative of responsibility, planning, and horizon, instead of constant intimidation.