Haddad attacked Tirosh over missing documents, the judge intervened and demanded answers

In a hearing in the Netanyahu trial, attorney Amit Haddad attacked the prosecution, alleging selective disclosure of documents. Judge Oded Shaham intervened and demanded answers from prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh, who admitted she had not personally reviewed all the protocols. Haddad also raised the issue of delays in transferring investigation materials and a missing item in video documentation.

In a hearing held today (Wednesday) in the Netanyahu trial, the prime minister's defense attorney, Amit Haddad, attacked the prosecution, alleging selective disclosure of investigation materials. Haddad demanded full exposure of protocols related to approvals given in the thousand cases, and Judge Oded Shaham intervened, demanding answers from prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh. Tirosh admitted she had not personally reviewed all the protocols related to Cases 1000 and 2000, but relied on her team's work. Haddad pointed to a protocol from July 2017 in which, according to him, former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit noted that he had not authorized a certain investigation direction – a document that did not appear in the original lists. Additionally, the defense attorney raised the issue of repeated delays in transferring the list of investigation materials, now postponed to November 23, and an item not located in video documentation from the interrogation of Tzachi Ben Hamo. Haddad asked: "Where is the black hole that all the documents disappear into?" Attorney Z'ak Chen, representing Shaul Elovitch, joined the criticism of the handling of the materials. The prosecution maintains that it is complying with the judges' decisions.