What about the Mecca Agreement for Joint Defense?
An analysis of the Mecca Agreement for Joint Defense between Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, which the author sees as an existential threat to Israel, linking it to the failure of normalization and the decline of American hegemony, and considering it a historical response to the Sharif Hussein alliance.
In an opinion article, Dr. Fayez Abu Shamala discusses the Mecca Agreement for Joint Defense signed between Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan, considering it an existential threat to Israel alone, and not to any other country. He points out that this alliance came amid strategic changes since the Battle of Al-Aqsa Flood, and that it represents a response to the expansionist Zionist project that aspires to establish Greater Israel. The author also sees that the agreement undermines the idea of normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel, despite American efforts. The article addresses doubts raised about the alliance serving American interests, but rejects them, affirming that Turkey, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia are far from serving the American project, especially after the exposure of America's inability to protect its allies. The author concludes that the Mecca alliance represents a historical response to the Sharif Hussein alliance with British colonialism in 1916, and that it restores Turkey's standing and erases a miserable phase from the history of the nation.