US Unhappy with Trump, Claim Iran Dictates the Pace of Events in the War

Criticism is growing within the US national security establishment over President Trump's handling of the war with Iran. A Wall Street Journal editorial attacks his decision to again halt military escalation in the Persian Gulf, citing his claim that agreements have been reached on the basic principles of a deal. According to reports, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman asked to withdraw from the move. The Wall Street Journal warns that Iran is managing the agenda and dictating the pace of escalation.

Criticism is growing within the American establishment over President Donald Trump's handling of the war with Iran. A pointed editorial in the Wall Street Journal attacks his decision to again halt military escalation in the Persian Gulf, relying on vague statements about a 'developing agreement'. On Saturday night, Trump posted a message claiming that Iran and other countries had asked to postpone a military strike, and that agreements had been reached on the basic principles, including the 'full and immediate' opening of the Strait of Hormuz and the end of the nuclear program. However, he provided no details. The turnaround came just days after reports of a decision to escalate in response to Iranian attacks. In Saudi Arabia, it was reported that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman asked to withdraw, fearing for oil facilities. The Wall Street Journal warns that if the information is correct, Iran is managing the agenda. Behind the scenes, Trump's motives are influenced by fears of economic consequences, such as a spike in oil and fuel prices ahead of midterm elections, and a drop in public support. The chaotic management of the war leaves the public without an understanding of the strategic goals, and Tehran is exploiting the signs of weakness.