Trump's circle at the sidelines of the secret conference: "Disappointment with Netanyahu, patience with him is running out"
On the sidelines of the secret MEAD conference in Washington, sources close to President Trump expressed deep disappointment with Prime Minister Netanyahu, who they claim has lost credibility on issues related to Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. Alongside this, assessments were presented that the Iranian regime has weakened significantly, Hezbollah is battered, and about 80% of Iranians oppose the regime. The conference also addressed the 20-point plan to end the war in Gaza, which American sources say Netanyahu is trying to sabotage.
On the sidelines of the fourth MEAD conference in Washington, convened during a sensitive period of uncertainty surrounding a confrontation with Iran and ahead of elections in Israel and the US, notable assessments were heard from sources who requested anonymity. Sources close to President Trump stated that he and his advisors are very disappointed with Netanyahu, who has lost credibility in their eyes on matters of Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. According to them, there is growing impatience with him behind the scenes, and they noted anger over his conduct regarding the 20-point plan to end the war in Gaza, which they claim he is trying to sabotage. Meanwhile, a former senior official in the Biden administration painted a grim picture of Israel's standing in the American arena, stating that young Democrats and Republicans are distancing themselves from Israel. In various panels, a broad assessment was presented that the Iranian regime has weakened significantly: the economy is in dire straits, the rial exchange rate has plummeted to about 2.3 million to the dollar, official inflation stands at about 88%, and about 80% of the Iranian public opposes the regime. Hezbollah was described as severely battered, and the Lebanese government as too weak to confront it. Regarding Gaza, a picture of some improvement emerged, but harsh claims were heard that Israel is preventing the entry of an international force and a technocratic committee. The conference was conducted under Chatham House rules, allowing open discussion.