Closing Galei Tzahal is a simple task. The opponents of the government's great luck is its inefficiency

An opinion article arguing that the great luck of the government's opponents is its inefficiency. The author analyzes the High Court ruling that canceled the government's decision to close Galei Tzahal, and argues that the government failed in a seemingly simple task due to overt political considerations and lack of legal planning. The author raises two possible explanations for the failure: a deliberate plan to lose in order to fuel a struggle against the judicial system, or using the closure attempt for internal publicity purposes while being indifferent to its success.

This opinion article argues that the great luck of the opponents of the current government is its inefficiency. The author focuses on the government's failure to close Galei Tzahal, a task he defines as 'uncomplicated.' He quotes the ruling of Justice Alex Stein, who canceled the government's decision to close the station, and determined that 'closing Galei Tzahal does not involve a complex procedure,' but required that the process be 'free of defects and extraneous considerations.' The author notes that the government failed to present a facade of substantive consideration, and that the establishment of the committee to examine the station was prompted by a letter from Communications Minister Karai to Defense Minister Katz, titled 'Closing Galei Tzahal and Privatizing the Frequencies.' The ruling quotes Karai's statements on social media calling the station 'Gantz's incitement' and 'a leftist station.' The author asks why the government planned such a clumsy move, and offers two possible answers: either the ministers planned to lose in order to fuel the struggle against the judicial system, or they used the closure attempt for internal publicity purposes among their voter base, while being indifferent to its success. He states that both options should anger the government's supporters.